Cookie settings
We save your cookie preference so this notice does not reappear. This site does not set advertising or analytics cookies. You can accept, reject or read our privacy policy.
Nothing here rests on a promise. Every entry clears a technical check first, and only then reaches scoring. That order is what makes the outcome readable instead of taken on faith.
The jury rotates each cycle, so no single panel sets the tone for everything. Scoring follows current practice, not a fixed in-house view.
File specs, category fit and rights clearance are verified first. Entries that stall here never reach a juror.
Practicing designers score each cycle, and the panel changes. No group carries its preferences from one year into the next.
Shortlisted work is published with jury notes, category rationale and credits. The reasoning sits next to the result.
Studios in Buenos Aires, Santo Domingo and elsewhere compare entries against past shortlists rather than against a single year.
Questions about a submission go through the contact page.
Interawards does not publish a partner roster, sponsor wall or endorsement list. No confirmed partner names, logos or affiliations are part of the program record, so none are shown here. What the platform does publish is the material a visitor can actually check: the technical check criteria, the rotating jury, and the shortlist archive with jury notes and credits.
File specs, category fit and rights clearance are reviewed before any entry reaches scoring.
Practicing designers score each cycle, and the panel changes so no single view shapes every round.
Shortlisted work appears with jury notes, category rationale and credits, readable cycle by cycle.
Independent studios, in-house teams and students submit through the same platform and the same review.
If your studio or school is interested in working with Interawards, write to support@interawards.com or call +54 11 5386-7385.